Graduate studies at Western
American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):10 – 14 (2007)
|Abstract||What role should the physician's conscience play in the practice of medicine? Much controversy has surrounded the question, yet little attention has been paid to the possibility that disputants are operating with contrasting definitions of the conscience. To illustrate this divergence, we contrast definitions stemming from Abrahamic religions and those stemming from secular moral tradition. Clear differences emerge regarding what the term conscience conveys, how the conscience should be informed, and what the consequences are for violating one's conscience. Importantly, these basic disagreements underlie current controversies regarding the role of the clinician's conscience in the practice of medicine. Consequently participants in ongoing debates would do well to specify their definitions of the conscience and the reasons for and implications of those definitions. This specification would allow participants to advance a more philosophically and theologically robust conversation about the means and ends of medicine.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. Schinkel (2007). Conscience and Conscientious Objections. Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David Bosco (1986). Conscience As Court And Worm: Calvin And The Three Elements Of Conscience. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):333-355.
Peter Godman (2009). Paradoxes of Conscience in the High Middle Ages: Abelard, Heloise, and the Archpoet. Cambridge University Press.
Donovan Miyasaki (2010). Nietzsche Contra Freud on Bad Conscience. Nietzsche-Studien 39 (1).
Mark C. Murphy (1997). The Conscience Principle. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
John J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (2008). What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Ryan Lawrence & Farr Curlin (2007). Response to Commentators on "Clash of Definitions: Controversies About Conscience in Medicine". American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):1-2.
Farr A. Curlin (2008). Conscience and Clinical Practice: Medical Ethics in the Face of Moral Controversy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):129-133.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,521 of 739,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?