David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 9 (3):178-191 (1980)
Abstract Fourteen moral judgment intervention studies were reviewed and evaluated. All used Rest's (1974) Defining Issues Test as an index of moral judgment development. Results showed that significant changes on the Defining Issues Test were related to duration and type of intervention and degree of experimental control over treatment variables. The studies provided independent support for the ability of the instrument to index upward movement after intervention programmes designed to influence development. Half the studies produced significant developmental change
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dawn R. Elm & James Weber (1994). Measuring Moral Judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or the Defining Issues Test? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):341 - 355.
Dann G. Fisher & John T. Sweeney (1998). The Relationship Between Political Attitudes and Moral Judgment: Examining the Validity of the Defining Issues Test. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):905-916.
Darcia Narvaez (2001). Moral Text Comprehension: Implications for Education and Research. Journal of Moral Education 30 (1):43-54.
Matthew Jason Borenstein, Robert Kirkman J. Drake & L. Swann Julie (2010). The Engineering and Science Issues Test (Esit): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2).
Patricia M. King & Matthew J. Mayhew (2002). Moral Judgement Development in Higher Education: Insights From the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):247-270.
Anne Colby, Lawrence Kohlberg, Edwin Fenton, Betsy Speicher‐Dubin & Marcus Lieberman (1977). Secondary School Moral Discussion Programmes Led by Social Studies Teachers. Journal of Moral Education 6 (2):90-111.
Terri Lee Robinett (2008). A Comparison of Moral Reasoning Stages Using a Model of Hierarchical Complexity. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):468 – 479.
James R. Rest & Darcia Narváez (eds.) (1994). Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Muriel J. Bebeau (2002). The Defining Issues Test and the Four Component Model: Contributions to Professional Education. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):271-295.
E. Pérez‐Delgado & J. C. Oliver (1995). The Influence of Age and Formal Education on Moral Reasoning in a Sample From Spain. Journal of Moral Education 24 (1):65-72.
Chiharu Ishida (2006). How Do Scores of DIT and MJT Differ? A Critical Assessment of the Use of Alternative Moral Development Scales in Studies of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):63 - 74.
Elaine Doyle, Jane Frecknall-Hughes & Barbara Summers (2009). Research Methods in Taxation Ethics: Developing the Defining Issues Test (Dit) for a Tax-Specific Scenario. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):35 - 52.
B. Lance Hurt & Norman A. Sprinthall (1977). Psychological and Moral Development for Teacher Education. Journal of Moral Education 6 (2):112-120.
Edmund V. Sullivan & Clive Beck (1974). A Developmental Approach to Assessment of Moral Education Programmes: A Short Commentary. Journal of Moral Education 4 (1):61-66.
Judith A. Boss (1994). The Effect of Community Service Work on the Moral Development of College Ethics Students. Journal of Moral Education 23 (2):183-198.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads9 ( #128,855 of 1,088,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,831 )
How can I increase my downloads?