David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):653-669 (2013)
What should we do when we won't do as we ought? Suppose it ought to be that the procrastinating professor accept the task of reviewing a book, and actually review the book. It seems clear that given he won't review it, he ought not to accept the task. That is a genuine moral obligation in light of less than perfect circumstances. I want to entertain the possibility that a set of such obligations form something like a 'practical morality'; that which we ought to do given that we're unlikely or unwilling to do much of what ideal morality demands. If it is possible to give a coherent account of these kinds of obligations, then it is possible to entertain the idea that these obligations are in fact what morality demands. The conceptual truths about justice (good, right, fairness) that come from ideals are one thing; the actions that morality demands of people given their actual circumstances are quite another. In this paper I will ask about the kinds of facts that can be used to establish a more circumscribed set of obligations than we get from the orthodox view about moral obligation.
|Keywords||Accessibility Feasibility Non-ideal theory Ought implies can Restricted possibility Non-compliance Weakness of will Partial compliance Dirty hands Obligations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard Holton (2009). Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford University Press.
Allen E. Buchanan (2004). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.
Daniel C. Dennett (1996). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):169-174.
A. John Simmons (2010). Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (1):5-36.
G. A. Cohen (2009). Why Not Socialism? Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Holly Lawford-Smith (2010). Feasibility Constraints for Political Theories. Dissertation, Australian National University
Judith Lichtenberg (2010). Oughts and Cans. Philosophical Topics 38 (1):123-142.
Gopal Sreenivasan (2007). Health and Justice in Our Non-Ideal World. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):218-236.
Holly Lawford-Smith (2012). The Feasibility of Collectives' Actions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):453-467.
Michael Davis (2012). Locke on Consent: The Two Treatises as Practical Ethics. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):464-485.
Bill Wringe (2014). Collective Obligations: Their Existence, Their Explanatory Power, and Their Supervenience on the Obligations of Individuals. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):472-497.
Olaf L. Mueller (2003). Can They Say What They Want? A Transcendental Argument Against Utilitarianism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):241-259.
Dale Jacquette (1991). Moral Dilemmas, Disjunctive Obligations, and Kant's Principle That 'Ought' Implies 'Can'. Synthese 88 (1):43 - 55.
Erik Carlson (2002). Deliberation, Foreknowledge, and Morality as a Guide to Action. Erkenntnis 57 (1):71-89.
Bill Wringe (2010). Global Obligations and the Agency Objection. Ratio 23 (2):217-231.
Wibren van der Burg & Sanne Taekema (2004). Motivation by Ideal. Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):91 – 98.
Scott Anderson (2013). On Sexual Obligation and Sexual Autonomy. Hypatia 28 (1):122-141.
Nellie Wieland (2011). Parental Obligation. Utilitas 23 (03):249-267.
Added to index2012-08-26
Total downloads276 ( #9,043 of 1,934,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)44 ( #12,495 of 1,934,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?