David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):25-31 (1998)
This paper criticizes the understanding of philosophy as entirely made up of argument. It gives some characterization of argument as a rhetorical form and conversation as a motivating attitude. It explicates the understanding of this distinction in Book 1 of Plato’s Republic, and emphasizes the contemporary relevance of the distinction by appeal to the work of Richard Rorty. While respectful of Rorty’s insights, it sides more with the Platonic understanding of philosophical conersation, which does not abandon the pursuit of truth
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Kreeft (2009). If Einstein Had Been a Surfer: A Surfer, a Scientist, and a Philosopher Discuss a "Universal Wave Theory" or "Theory of Everything". St. Augustine's Press.
Lou Marinoff (2012). The Inner Philosopher: Conversations on Philosophy's Transformative Power. Dialogue Path Press.
Stephen Mulhall (2007). The Conversation of Humanity. University of Virginia Press.
Nel Noddings (1994). Conversation as Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 23 (2):107-118.
Yoni Van Den Eede (2010). “Conversation of Mankind” or “Idle Talk”?: A Pragmatist Approach to Social Networking Sites. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):195-206.
R. Michael Olson (2011). Doing Some Good to Friends. Journal of Philosophical Research 36:149-172.
A. Huddleston (2012). The Conversation Argument for Actual Intentionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):241-256.
Celia Kitzinger (2008). Developing Feminist Conversation Analysis: A Response to Wowk. [REVIEW] Human Studies 31 (2):179 - 208.
Anna Marmodoro (2008). In Being One Only One? The Argument for the Uniqueness of the Platonic Forms. Apeiron (4):211-227.
Jari I. Niemi (2005). Habermas and Validity Claims. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):227 – 244.
Davide Orsi (2012). Philosophy and Criticism Conversation in Michael Oakeshotts Thought. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 18 (1):7-29.
Zali Gurevitch (1998). The Symposium: Culture as Daimonic Conversation. [REVIEW] Human Studies 21 (4):437-454.
Norman Geras (1995). Solidarity in the Conversation of Humankind: The Ungroundable Liberalism of Richard Rorty. Verso.
Gary Gutting (2009). What Philosophers Know: Case Studies in Recent Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Sterling Lynch (2007). Romantic Longings, Moral Ideals, and Democratic Priorities: On Richard Rorty's Use of the Distinction Between the Private and the Public. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #258,452 of 1,102,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,386 of 1,102,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?