David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 5 (3):205 – 215 (1995)
In this article, I present a contractualist conception of human-participant research ethics, arguing that the most appropriate source of the rights and responsibilities of researcher and participant is the contractual understanding between them. This conception appears to explain many of the more fundamental ethical incidents of human-participant research. I argue that a system of contractual rights and responsibilities would allow a great deal of research that has often been felt to be ethically problematic, such as research involving deception, concealed research, and research on dependent populations. However, in defining the conditions under which such research should be permissible, my contractualist theory also makes it clear that there are limits-and explains what those limits are-to the propriety of such research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tom L. Beauchamp (2009). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Robert J. Levine (1986). Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. Urban & Schwarzenberg.
Robert Veatch (1988). The Patient as Partner: A Theory of Human Experimentation Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):190-190.
Stanley Milgram (1977). Subject Reaction: The Neglected Factor in the Ethics of Experimentation. Hastings Center Report 7 (5):19-23.
Charles W. Wolfram (1986). Modern Legal Ethics. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Isaac Prilleltensky, Amy Rossiter & Richard Walsh-Bowers (1996). Preventing Harm and Promoting Ethical Discourse in the Helping Professions: Conceptual, Research, Analytical, and Action Frameworks. Ethics and Behavior 6 (4):287-306.
Similar books and articles
Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) (2009). The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Sonja Grover (2003). On the Limits of Parental Proxy Consent: Children's Right to Non-Participation in Non-Therapeutic Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (4):349-383.
K. G. Davey (2009). Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.
Allan J. Kimmel, N. Craig Smith & Jill Gabrielle Klein (2011). Ethical Decision Making and Research Deception in the Behavioral Sciences: An Application of Social Contract Theory. Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):222 - 251.
Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara (2011). Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research. Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Paula Meth & Knethiwe Malaza (2003). Violent Research: The Ethics and Emotions of Doing Research with Women in South Africa. Ethics, Place and Environment 6 (2):143 – 159.
Michael McDonald & Susan Cox (2009). Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):1-16.
Debora Diniz (2008). Research Ethics in Social Sciences: The Severina's Story Documentary. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):23 - 35.
Bryan Benham (2008). Moral Accountability and Debriefing. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 253-273.
Sami Alsmadi (2008). Marketing Research Ethics: Researcher's Obligations Toward Human Subjects. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):153-160.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #404,953 of 1,725,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,161 of 1,725,153 )
How can I increase my downloads?