David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Levinas Studies 2:175-196 (2007)
When Emmanuel Levinas writes (in the preface of Totality and Infinity) that Franz Rosenzweig’s Stern der Erlösung is “a work too often present in this book to be cited,” he effectively names his debt to F. W. J. Schelling as well, for Rosenzweig’s work was a sustained attempt to carry to completion Schelling’s great philosophical fragment, the Weltalter. Scholars of Levinas have explored Levinas’s relationship to Schelling, but I confess that, as a Schelling scholar, I knew nothing of this connection until rather recently. I credit above all the energetic work of Jason Wirth for helping me see its importance — and more generally the importance of reading Schelling in the context of recent work in continental philosophy. None of this has been easy. The very thing that Schelling and Levinas have in common, their resistance to the implicit solipsism of overcoming mystery with clarity, make them poor candidates for quick appropriation and comparison. Indeed, Schelling anticipated Nietzsche by openly mocking the scholars who make it their business to “appropriate and compare.” Mockery and ridicule is, ofcourse, not Levinas’s way of going about things. Even so, he too is so relentless in his polemic against the totalizing desire to know that he forces his reader to pause and question just what a proper scholarly response to his work might be. As such, the very first result of taking up the question of Schelling and Levinas might be that we are forced to set aside the scholarly mask, testimony of one’s acquiescence to the order of the same, in order to step forth as the human beings that we are. Whether this is an act of humility or of arrogance is not at all clear. Dispensing with the pretense of knowledge takes a kind of boldness on our part — for what but knowledge might give us a claim to the attention of others?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Drew M. Dalton (2006). The Pains of Contraction Understanding Creation in Levinas Through Schelling. Studia Phaenomenologica 6 (1):215 - 240.
David Farrell Krell (2004). Nietzschean Reminiscences of Schelling's Philosophy of Mythology (1842). Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):181-193.
Jason Wirth (2004). Mitwissenschaft. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):215-232.
Drew M. Dalton (2008). Being and Time for Schelling. Idealistic Studies 38 (3):175-184.
Mathew A. Foust (2012). Confess Your Contradictions: Schelling, Royce, and the Art of Atonement. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26 (3):516-530.
Peter Warnek (2004). Schelling's Second Sailing. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):195-214.
Frank Schalow (1997). Traces of Love Inscribed by Deeds: The Question of Immortality and Schelling's Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (2):243 - 256.
Dalia Nassar (2010). From a Philosophy of Self to a Philosophy of Nature: Goethe and the Development of Schelling's Naturphilosophie. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (3):304-321.
Tyler Tritten (2012). Beyond Presence: The Late F.W.J. Schelling's Criticism of Metaphysics. De Gruyter.
Drew Dalton (2006). The Pains of Contraction. Studia Phaenomenologica 6 (1):215-240.
Drew M. Dalton (2009). Otherwise Than Nothing. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):105-128.
H. G. Callaway (1996). Schelling and the Background of American Pragmatism:. [REVIEW] Arisbe, Peirce-Related Papers 1:1-12.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads20 ( #193,195 of 1,911,311 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #252,427 of 1,911,311 )
How can I increase my downloads?