Thomas Aquinas, Jean-Luc Marion, and an Alleged Category Mistake Involving God and Being

Abstract
This article seeks to defend the possibility of a metaphysical approach to philosophical theology. Challenging the claim that there can be nothing in commonbetween God (with whom theology or even a form of phenomenology such as Jean-Luc Marion’s deals) and being (as expounded for example in the metaphysical approach of Thomas Aquinas), the article develops a critique of Marion’s views with close reference to his interpretations of Aquinas
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
    Michael B. Ewbank (2002). Of Idols, Icons, and Aquinas's Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):161-175.
    Walter Redmond (2008). A Nothing That Is: Edith Stein on Being Without Essence. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):71-86.
    Eileen C. Sweeney (2009). Seeing Double. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):389-420.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    9 ( #128,885 of 1,089,048 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,948 of 1,089,048 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.