David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 47 (1):1-37 (1980)
Grunbaum has argued that the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis is not ad hoc since the Kennedy-Thorndike experiment can be used to provide a test that is significantly different from that provided by the Michelson-Morley experiment. In the first part of the paper, I show that the differences claimed by Grunbaum to hold between these two experiments are not sufficient for establishing independent testability. A dilemma is developed: either the Kennedy-Thorndike experiment, because of experimental realities, cannot test the uncontracted Fresnel aether theory, or if experimental difficulties are ignored, the Kennedy-Thorndike experiment degenerates into a version of the Michelson-Morley experiment. The second part of the paper is a feasibility study of the prospects for defining experimental types according to aims of measurement and determination. This approach is applied to the contraction hypothesis, where it is suggested that the usual analysis of independent testability be modified
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Samuel Schindler (2008). Use-Novel Predictions and Mendeleev's Periodic Table: Response To. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):265-269.
Similar books and articles
Maria Caamaño Alegre (2009). Experimental Validity and Pragmatic Modes in Empirical Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):19-45.
Herman Erlichson (1981). The Michelson-Morley and Kennedy-Thorndike Experiments. Philosophy of Science 48 (4):620-622.
Harvey R. Brown (2001). The Origins of Length Contraction: I. The Fitzgerald-Lorentz Deformation Hypothesis. American Journal of Physics 69:1044-1054.
Carlo Giannoni (1978). A Universal Axiomatization of Kinematical Theories. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:60 - 70.
Lydia Patton (2011). Reconsidering Experiments. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):209-226.
Melbourne G. Evans (1969). On the Falsity of the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Contraction Hypothesis. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):354-362.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #165,643 of 1,410,466 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,466 )
How can I increase my downloads?