David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):288-288 (2005)
Operational sex ratio (OSR) is the correct sex ratio measure for predicting sociosexuality, but it is unclear whether this is the measure used. It would be valuable to know how OSR and sociosexuality correlate separately for males and females. The relationship between sociosexuality and OSR should also be examined with OSR measured at the local level of the mating market, where sex ratio must be having its psychological effects.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Clark & Martin Daly (2005). What is the Significance of Cross-National Variability in Sociosexuality? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):280-280.
Steve Stewart-Williams (2005). Fitting Data to Theory: The Contribution of a Comparative Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):294-295.
David P. Schmitt (2005). Sociosexuality From Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-Nation Study of Sex, Culture, and Strategies of Human Mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):247-275.
Timothy F. Murphy (2013). Getting Past Nature as a Guide to the Human Sex Ratio. Bioethics 27 (4):224-232.
David P. Schmitt (2005). Measuring Sociosexuality Across People and Nations: Revisiting the Strengths and Weaknesses of Cross-Cultural Sex Research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):297-304.
Alice H. Eagly & Wendy Wood (2005). Universal Sex Differences Across Patriarchal Cultures [Not Equal] Evolved Psychological Dispositions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):281-283.
David P. Barash (2005). Sex Differences: Empiricism, Hypothesis Testing, and Other Virtues. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):276-277.
Myra J. Hird (2004). Sex, Gender, and Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Todd K. Shackelford, Gregory J. LeBlanc, Richard L. Michalski & Viviana A. Weekes (2000). Analyses of Mating Differences Within-Sex and Between-Sex Are Complementary, Not Competing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):621-621.
Bernhard Fink, John T. Manning & Nick Neave (2005). The Second to Fourth Digit Ratio, Sociosexuality, and Offspring Sex Ratio. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):283-284.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #248,482 of 1,413,240 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #153,719 of 1,413,240 )
How can I increase my downloads?