David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):499 (2004)
Objective: To describe the frequency of support for terminal sedation among internists, determine whether support for terminal sedation is accompanied by support for physician assisted suicide , and explore characteristics of internists who support terminal sedation but not assisted suicide.Design: A statewide, anonymous postal survey.Setting: Connecticut, USA.Participants: 677 Connecticut members of the American College of Physicians.Measurements: Attitudes toward terminal sedation and assisted suicide; experience providing primary care to terminally ill patients; demographic and religious characteristics.Results: 78% of respondents believed that if a terminally ill patient has intractable pain despite aggressive analgesia, it is ethically appropriate to provide terminal sedation . Of those who favoured terminal sedation, 38% also agreed that PAS is ethically appropriate in some circumstances. Along a three point spectrum of aggressiveness in end of life care, the plurality of respondents were in the middle, agreeing with terminal sedation but not with PAS. Compared with respondents who were less aggressive or more aggressive, physicians in this middle group were more likely to report having more experience providing primary care to terminally ill patients and attending religious services more frequently .Conclusions: Support for terminal sedation was widespread in this population of physicians, and most who agreed with terminal sedation did not support PAS. Most internists who support aggressive palliation appear likely to draw an ethical line between terminal sedation and assisted suicide
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Aasim Padela & Afshan Mohiuddin (2015). Ethical Obligations and Clinical Goals in End-of-Life Care: Deriving a Quality-of-Life Construct Based on the Islamic Concept of Accountability Before God. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (1):3-13.
Roger S. Magnusson (2006). The Devil's Choice: Re-Thinking Law, Ethics, and Symptom Relief in Palliative Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (3):559-569.
Bernd Alt-Epping, Friedemann Nauck & Birgit Jaspers (2015). Was Ist Das Problematische an der Palliativen Sedierung? – Eine ÜbersichtWhat is Problematic with Palliative Sedation?: A Review. Ethik in der Medizin 27 (3):219-231.
Roger S. Magnusson (2009). The Traditional Account of Ethics and Law at the End of Life—and its Discontents. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):307-324.
Roger S. Magnusson (2006). The Devil's Choice: Re-Thinking Law, Ethics, and Symptom Relief in Palliative Care. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):559-569.
Similar books and articles
Victor Cellarius (2011). 'Early Terminal Sedation' is a Distinct Entity. Bioethics 25 (1):46-54.
S. N. Etkind (2012). Terminal Sedation: An Emotional Decision in End-of-Life Care. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):508-509.
Charles D. Douglas, Ian H. Kerridge & Rachel A. Ankeny (2013). Narratives of 'Terminal Sedation', and the Importance of the Intention-Foresight Distinction in Palliative Care Practice. Bioethics 27 (1):1-11.
Kenneth J. Doka (ed.) (2012). End-of-Life Ethics: A Case Study Approach. Hospice Foundation of America.
Joseph Boyle (2004). Medical Ethics and Double Effect: The Case of Terminal Sedation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):51-60.
Alison McIntyre (2004). The Double Life of Double Effect. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.
D. Micah Hester (2010). End-of-Life Care and Pragmatic Decision Making: A Bioethical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Joan McCarthy (ed.) (2011). End-of-Life Care: Ethics and Law. Cork University Press.
James L. Werth & Dean Blevins (eds.) (2008). Decision Making Near the End of Life: Issues, Development, and Future Directions. Brunner-Routledge.
George P. Smith (1998). Terminal Sedation as Palliative Care: Revalidating a Right to a Good Death. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):382-387.
H. ten Have & David Clark (eds.) (2002). The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives. Open University Press.
Y. Tony Yang & Margaret M. Mahon (2012). Palliative Care for the Terminally Ill in America: The Consideration of QALYs, Costs, and Ethical Issues. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):411-416.
David J. Doukas, Daniel W. Gorenflo & Barbara Supanich (1999). Primary Care Physician Attitudes and Values Toward End-of-Life Care and Physician-Assisted Death. Ethics and Behavior 9 (3):219 – 230.
Mary Ann Baily (2011). Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads7 ( #423,621 of 1,796,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,495 of 1,796,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?