David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):196-204 (2006)
Our response amplifies our case that money is best seen as both a drug and a tool. Some commentators challenge our core assumptions: In this response we, therefore, explain in more detail why we assume that money is an exceptionally strong motivator, and that a biological explanation of money motivation is required. We also provide evidence to support those assumptions. Other commentators criticise our use of the drug metaphor, particularly arguing that it is empirically empty; and in our response we seek to show how it can be submitted to test – aided by some commentaries which suggest such tests. In addition, we explain, with evidence, why we do not think that the notion of money as a generalised conditioned reinforcer provides a satisfactory alternative to the tool/drug account. The largest group of commentaries suggests alternative instincts on which the drug-like effects of money might be based, other than the reciprocation and play instincts we propose; in our response, we explain why we still prefer our original proposals, but we accept that alternative or additional instincts may indeed underlie money motivation. A final group of commentaries carries the argument further, suggesting extensions to the tool/drug model, in ways with which we are broadly in sympathy. The purpose of the tool and drug metaphors is to encourage reflection on the biological origins of money motivation, and to that extent at least we believe that they have succeeded. (Published Online April 5 2006).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
N. Emrah Aydinonat (2010). Neuroeconomics: More Than Inspiration, Less Than Revolution. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):159-169.
Similar books and articles
Don Ross & David Spurrett (2006). Evolutionary Psychology and Functionally Empty Metaphors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):192-193.
Adrian J. Walsh (2006). Money Motives, Moral Philosophy, and Biological Explanations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):195-196.
Arthur B. Markman, Serge Blok, John Dennis, Micah Goldwater, Kyungil Kim, Jeff Laux, Lisa Narvaez & Jon Rein (2006). Money and Motivational Activation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):190-190.
Giorgio A. Ascoli & Kevin A. McCabe (2006). Scarcity Begets Addiction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):178-178.
David A. Booth (2006). Money as Tool, Money as Resource: The Biology of Collecting Items for Their Own Sake. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):180-181.
Gordon M. Burghardt (2006). Money, Play, and Instincts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):182-183.
Sanjay Chandrasekharan (2006). Money as Epistemic Structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):183-184.
Russell Belk (2006). Money as Civilizing Ritual. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):180-180.
Simon Kemp & Randolph C. Grace (2006). Operant Contingencies and “Near-Money”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):188-188.
Stephen E. G. Lea & Paul Webley (2006). Money as Tool, Money as Drug: The Biological Psychology of a Strong Incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):161-209.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #232,970 of 1,792,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #207,320 of 1,792,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?