David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper argues that if one considers just a single clinical moment there may be no principled way to choose among different approaches to psychoanalytic technique. One must in addition take into account what Aristotle called the final cause of psychoanalysis, which this paper argues is freedom. However, freedom is itself an open-ended concept with many aspects that need to be explored and developed from a psychoanalytic perspective. This paper considers one analytic moment from the perspectives of the techniques of Paul Gray, Hans Loewald, the contemporary Kleinians and Jacques Lacan. It argues that, if we are to evaluate these techniques, we must take into account the different conceptions of freedom they are trying to facilitate.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Betty Joseph (2004). A Missing Link in Psychoanalytic Technique: Psychoanalytic Consciousness. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85 (3):572-574.
Fred Busch & Betty Joseph (2004). A Missing Link in Psychoanalytic Technique: Psychoanalytic Consciousness. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85 (3):567-578.
Charles Bingham (2002). On Paulo Freire's Debt to Psychoanalysis: Authority on the Side of Freedom. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (6):447-464.
William Joseph Massicotte (1994). A Philosophical Examination of Recent Clinical and Theoretical Psychoanalysis. Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
Joy Damousi & Mariano Ben Plotkin (eds.) (2012). Psychoanalysis and Politics: Histories of Psychoanalysis Under Conditions of Restricted Political Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Michael Parsons (2000). The Dove That Returns, the Dove That Vanishes: Paradox and Creativity in Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Jean-Michel Rabaté (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Lacan. Cambridge University Press.
André Haynal (1993). Psychoanalysis and the Sciences: Epistemology--History. University of California Press.
Mauro Pasqualini (2012). Origin, Rise, and Destruction of a Psychoanalytic Culture in Fascist Italy, 1922-1938. In Joy Damousi & Mariano Ben Plotkin (eds.), Psychoanalysis and Politics: Histories of Psychoanalysis Under Conditions of Restricted Political Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Louise Gyler (2010). The Gendered Unconscious: Can Gender Discourses Subvert Psychoanalysis? Routledge.
Jeanne L. Schroeder & David Gray Carlson (2009). Psychoanalysis as the Jurisprudence of Freedom. In Francis J. Mootz & William S. Boyd (eds.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press.
Jan Campbell (2000). Arguing with the Phallus: Feminist, Queer, and Postcolonial Theory: A Psychoanalytic Contribution. Distributed in the Usa Exclusively by St. Martin's Press.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads32 ( #61,680 of 1,413,365 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,237 of 1,413,365 )
How can I increase my downloads?