Change and the eternal part of the mind in Spinoza

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):369-384 (2010)
Abstract
Spinoza insists that we can during the course of our lives increase that part of the mind that is constituted by knowledge, but he also calls that part of the mind its eternal part. How can what is eternal increase? I defend an interpretation on which there is a sense in which the eternal part of the mind can become greater without changing intrinsically at all
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,561
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Steven Parchment (2000). The Mind's Eternity in Spinoza's Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (3):349-382.
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Andrew Youpa (2011). Spinoza on the Very Nature of Existence. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (1):310-334.
Jagdish Chander & K. B. (1983). Eternal Drama of Souls, Matter, and God. Prajapati Brama Kumaris Ishwariya Vishwa-Vidyalaya.
Stephen H. Voss & Charles Sayward (1976). Eternal Sentences. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):14 – 23.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

30 ( #56,568 of 1,098,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #42,748 of 1,098,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.