David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We appear to be at a critical juncture where the impetus to procure autonomous systems to address urgent needs may push us past our reservations about robots and into embracing a rapidly evolving technology with far-reaching implications. The pursuit of humanoid robots is a fact—it is an ongoing, highly attractive field that cannot be ignored solely on the grounds that the ultimate aim might never be achieved. The issue of realization of a humanoid robot is only tangential to what the research and development of humanoid robots has the potential to reveal to us about our own humanity. The humanoid robot is chosen for a very specific reason—the disciplines within this select field of robotics are oriented toward recreating particular human capabilities or traits, and the humanoid form relates both philosophical and scientific concepts of the need for "embodiment" to the development of true autonomy. The development of humanoid robots connects the works of fiction, philosophy, and technology in a very direct way that allows the exploration of the meaning of humanity in an age of advanced technology. This dissertation examines what humanoid robotics reveals and what it has the potential to reveal about the search for knowledge, the search for the meaning of existence, and the understanding of reality. Both the scientific and fictional investigations of humanoid robots change our views about what a human really is. New questions are raised as a result of the dynamic tension between technologists and humanists. Humanoid robotics is most productively studied from an interdisciplinary, phenomenological perspective, as we must consider the cultural and epistemological impacts of humanoid robots on us as we strive to recreate ourselves. ^
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Min-Sun Kim & Eun-Joo Kim (2013). Humanoid Robots as “The Cultural Other”: Are We Able to Love Our Creations? [REVIEW] AI and Society 28 (3):309-318.
Christian Becker-Asano, Takayuki Kanda, Carlos Ishi & Hiroshi Ishiguro (2011). Studying Laughter in Combination with Two Humanoid Robots. AI and Society 26 (3):291-300.
Aleksandra Kupferberg, Stefan Glasauer, Markus Huber, Markus Rickert, Alois Knoll & Thomas Brandt (2011). Biological Movement Increases Acceptance of Humanoid Robots as Human Partners in Motor Interaction. AI and Society 26 (4):339-345.
Richard Swinburne (2005). Prior Probabilities in the Argument From Fine-Tuning. Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):641 - 653.
Anne Foerst (1998). Cog, a Humanoid Robot, and the Question of the Image of God. Zygon 33 (1):91-111.
C. T. A. Schmidt (2005). Of Robots and Believing. Minds and Machines 15 (2):195-205.
Fulvio Mastrogiovanni, Antonello Scalmato, Antonio Sgorbissa & Renato Zaccaria (2011). Problem Awareness for Skilled Humanoid Robots. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 3 (01):91-114.
Rodney A. Brooks, Cynthia Breazeal, Matthew Marjanovic, Brian Scassellati & Matthew Williamson (1999). The Cog Project: Building a Humanoid Robot. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1562:52-87.
Tatsuya Nomura, Takugo Tasaki, Takayuki Kanda, Masahiro Shiomi, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Norihiro Hagita (2006). Questionnaire-Based Social Research on Opinions of Japanese Visitors for Communication Robots at an Exhibition. AI and Society 21 (1-2):167-183.
Michael Decker, Rüdiger Dillmann, Thomas Dreier, Martin Fischer, Mathias Gutmann, Ingrid Ott & Indra Spiecker Genannt Döhmann (2011). Service Robotics: Do You Know Your New Companion? Framing an Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 8 (1):25-44.
John P. Sullins (2002). Building Simple Mechanical Minds: Using Lego Robots for Research and Teaching in Philosophy. In James Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (eds.), Metaphilosophy. Blackwell Pub. 110-122.
Amanda Sharkey & Noel Sharkey (2012). Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):27-40.
Added to index2011-11-19
Total downloads10 ( #313,434 of 1,789,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #423,018 of 1,789,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?