David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Health Care Analysis 9 (3):353-368 (2001)
Opposition to `ownership' of cells and tissues often depends on arguments about the special or sacred nature of human bodies and other living things. Such arguments are not very helpful in dealing with the patenting of DNA fragments. Two arguments undergird support for patenting: the notion that an author has a `right' to an invention resulting from his/her labor, and the utilitarian argument that patents are needed to support medical inventiveness. The labor theory of ownership rights is subject to critique, though it may still have enduring value. The more important argument is that deriving from the common good. If patents on DNA are supported on the basis of their contributions to the common good, then they can also be limited based on considerations of the common good
|Keywords||bodies common good DNA ownership patenting rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
José Pierrez & Xavier Ronot (1992). Flow Cytometric Analysis of the Cell Cycle: Mathematical Modeling and Biological Interpretation. Acta Biotheoretica 40 (2-3).
Hans Radder (2004). Exploiting Abstract Possibilities: A Critique of the Concept and Practice of Product Patenting. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):275-291.
David B. Resnik (2002). The Commercialization of Human Stem Cells: Ethical and Policy Issues. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 10 (2):127-154.
David B. Resnik (2001). DNA Patents and Scientific Discovery and Innovation: Assessing Benefits and Risks. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):29-62.
Deng K. Niu & Ya F. Wang (1995). Why Animals Have Tumours. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (3).
A. M. Viens (2009). Morality Provisions in Law Concerning the Commercialization of Human Embryos and Stem Cells. In Aurora Plomer & Paul Torremans (eds.), Embryonic Stem Cell Patents: European Patent Law and Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Philip Kitcher (2002). On the Explanatory Role of Correspondence Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):346-364.
Jacques Demongeot (2009). Biological Boundaries and Biological Age. Acta Biotheoretica 57 (4).
David K. Chan (2005). Should Human Genes Be Patented? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):30-36.
François Leitner, Sylvain Paillasson, Xavier Ronot & Jacques Demongeot (1995). Dynamic Functional and Structural Analysis of Living Cells: New Tools for Vital Staining of Nuclear DNA and for Characterisation of Cell Motion. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (4).
Robert W. Korn (1993). Apical Cells as Meristems. Acta Biotheoretica 41 (3).
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads5 ( #216,860 of 1,096,570 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?