An Examination of Irigaray's Commitment to Transcendental Phenomenology in The Forgetting of Air and The Way of Love
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 28 (3):452-468 (2013)
Although sexual difference is widely regarded as the concept that lies at the center of Luce Irigaray's thought, its meaning and significance is highly contested. This dissensus, however, attests to more than merely the existence of a recalcitrant conceptual ambiguity. That is, Irigaray's discussion of sexual difference remains fraught not because she leaves this concept undefined but because the centrality of sexual difference in fact marks a complex and unstable nexus of phenomena that shift throughout her work. Consequently, if Irigaray is indeed the preeminent thinker of sexual difference, this is not in virtue of her recurrent appeal to a monolithic, readily digestible concept but rather somehow despite the absence of precisely this gesture. In this paper, I will attempt to elucidate the peculiar preeminence of sexual difference in Irigaray's work by identifying her persistent, though largely unexamined, commitment to transcendental phenomenology. Indeed, I attempt to show that the complex of phenomena of sexual difference emerges in L'oubli de l'air and The Way of Love as a modulation of Heidegger's own revision of transcendental phenomenology. In this sense, the peculiar preeminence of sexual difference does not mark the centrality of a concept but Irigaray's amplification of this Heideggerian gesture
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Edmund Husserl (1980). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Anthony J. Steinbock (1995). Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology After Husserl. Northwestern University Press.
Rudolf Bernet, Iso Kern & Eduard Marbach (1993). An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Martin Heidegger (1969). Identity and Difference. New York, Harper & Row.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anne van Leeuwen (2010). Sexuate Difference, Ontological Difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126.
Alison Stone (2006). Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge University Press.
Helen Fielding (2003). Questioning Nature: Irigaray, Heidegger and the Potentiality of Matter. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (1):1-26.
Krzysztof Ziarek (2000). Proximities: Irigaray and Heidegger on Difference. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 33 (2):133-158.
William Robert (2010). Antigone's Nature. Hypatia 25 (2):412 - 436.
Penelope Deutscher (2002). A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray. Cornell University Press.
Kate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
Judith Still (2010). Hospitality and Sexual Difference: Remembering Homer with Luce Irigaray. In Elena Tzelepis & Athena Athanasiou (eds.), Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and "the Greeks". State University of New York Press
Luce Irigaray (1999). The Forgetting of Air in Martin Heidegger. University of Texas Press.
Evelien Geerts, Forcefully Subverting or Reinforcing Dichotomies? Elizabeth Grosz‟s Feminist Rereading of Charles Darwin, Via the Perspectives of Jacques Derrida and Luce Irigaray.
Dorothea Olkowski (2000). The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray. Hypatia 15 (3):73-91.
Shaun O'Dwyer (2006). The Unacknowledged Socrates in the Works of Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 21 (2):28-44.
Gayle Salamon (2010). Sameness, Alterity, Flesh: Luce Irigaray and the Place of Sexual Undecidability. In Elena Tzelepis & Athena Athanasiou (eds.), Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and "the Greeks". State University of New York Press
Diane Perpich (2003). Subjectivity and Sexual Difference: New Figures of the Feminine in Irigaray and Cavarero. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (4):391-413.
Added to index2011-12-20
Total downloads20 ( #231,991 of 1,932,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #333,140 of 1,932,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?