Disposition, Explanation, and Causation—A Defense of the Reformed Conditional Analysis of Disposition

Philosophia 38 (3):569-577 (2010)
D. Lewis proposed the reformed conditional analysis of disposition to handle Martin's influential counterexamples to the simple counterfactual analysis. Some philosophers, however, argue that the mere fact that the reformed conditional analysis of disposition can handle Martin's counterexamples should not be regarded as a reason to prefer the reformed conditional analysis to the simple analysis. In this paper, I argue that the reformed version should be preferred not because it can handle Martin's counterexamples but because there are other counterexamples to the simple conditional analysis
Keywords Disposition  Explanation  Simple counterfactual analysis  Reformed counterfactual analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Alexander Bird (1998). Dispositions and Antidotes. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191):227-234.

    View all 8 references

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    55 ( #23,988 of 1,089,057 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,944 of 1,089,057 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.