Philosophy of Science 57 (1):158-168 (1990)
|Abstract||Suppose my utilities are representable by a set of utility assignments, each defined for atomic sentences; suppose my beliefs are representable by a set of probability assignments. Then each of my utility assignments together with each of my probability assignments will determine a utility assignment to non-atomic sentences, in a familiar way. This paper is concerned with the question, whether I am committed to all the utility assignments so constructible. Richard Jeffrey (1984) says (in effect) "no", Isaac Levi (1974) says "yes". I argue for "no", and raise in passing a problem for Levi|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James M. Joyce (2000). Why We Still Need the Logic of Decision. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):13.
Isaac Levi (1986). Hard Choices: Decision Making Under Unresolved Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
Reed Richter (1984). Rationality Revisited. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):392 – 403.
Mark Kaplan (1983). Practical and Scientific Rationality: A Bayesian Perspective on Levi's Difficulty. Synthese 57 (3):277 - 282.
Teddy Seidenfeld, Extensions of Expected Utility Theory and Some Limitations of Pairwise Comparisons.
Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark J. Schervish & Joseph B. Kadane (2010). Coherent Choice Functions Under Uncertainty. Synthese 172 (1).
Wolfgang Spohn (2006). Isaac Levi's Potentially Surprising Epistemological Picture. In Erik J. Olsson (ed.), Knowledge and Inquiry: Essays on the Pragmatism of Isaac Levi. Cambridge University Press.
Isaac Levi (2006). Decisions and Revisions: Philosophical Essays on Knowledge and Value. Cambridge University Press.
Martin Peterson (2003). Transformative Decision Rules. Erkenntnis 58 (1):71-85.
Richard Jeffrey (1987). Indefinite Probability Judgment: A Reply to Levi. Philosophy of Science 54 (4):586-591.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 550,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?