Reasons and Religious Belief

Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):19-34 (1989)
The problem addressed is: whether religious belief, defined here as accepting that God has revealed and that what he has revealed is true, could ever be rational. That is, does the idea of religious belief imply that it is irrational? The author attempts to resolve this problem in favor of religious belief, and suggests how reasons can legitimately function in religious belief. The evidentialist objection to religion is answered, and it is proposed that reasons might function, not to prove that God has revealed, or that what he has revealed is true, but that the choice to believe is a morally responsible one
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/faithphil1989611
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,675
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Linda Zagzebski (2011). First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):285 - 304.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

25 ( #168,129 of 2,048,160 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #45,747 of 2,048,160 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.