Graduate studies at Western
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):35-44 (2009)
|Abstract||The convergence of increasingly efficient high throughput sequencing technology and ubiquitous Internet use by the public has fueled the proliferation of companies that provide personal genetic information (PGI) direct-to-consumers. Companies such as 23andme (Mountain View, CA) and Navigenics (Foster City, CA) are emblematic of a growing market for PGI that some argue represents a paradigm shift in how the public values this information and incorporates it into how they behave and plan for their futures. This new class of social networking business ventures that market the science of the personal genome illustrates the new trend in collaborative science. In addition to fostering a consumer empowerment movement, it promotes the trend of democratizing information?openly sharing of data with all interested parties, not just the biomedical researcher?for the purposes of pooling data (increasing statistical power) and escalating the innovation process. This target article discusses the need for new approaches to studying DTC genomics using social network analysis to identify the impact of obtaining, sharing, and using PGI. As a locus of biosociality, DTC personal genomics forges social relationships based on beliefs of common genetic susceptibility that links risk, disease, and group identity. Ethical issues related to the reframing of DTC personal genomic consumers as advocates and research subjects and the creation of new social formations around health research may be identified through social network analysis|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley (2009). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics”. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):1-3.
Richard F. Beltramini (2006). Consumer Believability of Information in Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Advertising of Prescription Drugs. Journal of Business Ethics 63 (4):333 - 343.
David Resnik (2009). Direct-to-Consumer Genomics, Social Networking, and Confidentiality. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):45-46.
Jin Seong Park & Jean M. Grow (2008). The Social Reality of Depression: Dtc Advertising of Antidepressants and Perceptions of the Prevalence and Lifetime Risk of Depression. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 79 (4):379 - 393.
Jordan Bartol (2013). Re-Examining the Gene in Personalized Genomics. Science and Education 22 (10):2529-2546.
Ellen Matloff & Arthur Caplan (2008). Direct to Confusion: Lessons Learned From Marketing Brca Testing. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):5 – 8.
Katherine Wasson (2009). Direct-to-Consumer Genomics and Research Ethics: Should a More Robust Informed Consent Process Be Included? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):56-58.
Dov Greenbaum & Mark Gerstein (2009). Social Networking and Personal Genomics: Suggestions for Optimizing the Interaction. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):15-19.
Roberta M. Berry, Lisa Bliss, Sylvia Caley, Paul A. Lombardo & Leslie E. Wolf (2013). Recent Developments in Health Care Law: Culture and Controversy. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 25 (1):1-24.
Pepijn K. C. van de Pol & Frank G. A. de Bakker (2010). Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Pharmaceuticals as a Matter of Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics 94 (2):211-224.
James L. Parrish (2010). PAPA Knows Best: Principles for the Ethical Sharing of Information on Social Networking Sites. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):187-193.
Anders Nordgren (2010). The Rhetoric Appeal to Identity on Websites of Companies Offering Non-Health-Related DNA Testing. Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):473-487.
Scott J. Vitell (2003). Consumer Ethics Research: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for the Future. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):33 - 47.
Bob Heere Matthew Walker, M. Parent Milena & Dan Drane (forthcoming). Social Responsibility and the Olympic Games: The Mediating Role of Consumer Attributions. Journal of Business Ethics.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads5 ( #170,671 of 750,430 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 750,430 )
How can I increase my downloads?