Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics”
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):1-3 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley (2009). Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) Genomics. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):35-44.
David Resnik (2009). Direct-to-Consumer Genomics, Social Networking, and Confidentiality. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):45-46.
Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben (2013). An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Inmaculada de Melo-Martin (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter?”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):3-4.
Martha Farah & Andrea Heberlein (2007). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Personhood and Neuroscience: Naturalizing or Nihilating?": Getting Personal. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):1-4.
Samuel M. Brown, C. Gregory Elliott & Robert Paine (2013). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Withdrawal of Nonfutile Life Support After Attempted Suicide”. Taylor and Francis 13 (3):W3 - W5.
David Wendler (2009). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?”. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2.
Angela Ballantyne (2010). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Robert J. Levine, Judith B. Gordon, Carolyn M. Mazure, Philip E. Rubin, Barry R. Schaller & John L. Young (2011). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Social Contexts Influence Ethical Considerations of Research”. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):W1-W2.
Autumn Fiester (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Justifying a Presumption of Restraint in Animal Biotechnology Research”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):W1 – W2.
Jason Scott Robert, Mary Sunderland, Rachel Ankeny & Jane Maienschein (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethos and Ethics of Translational Research”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):1-3.
Dov Greenbaum & Mark Gerstein (2009). Social Networking and Personal Genomics: Suggestions for Optimizing the Interaction. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):15-19.
Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin Wilfond (2006). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
Mildred Cho, Sara Tobin, Henry Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
Nancy Jecker (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Broader View of Justice”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):1-2.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-14Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,753 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,753 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
