The Case of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Orders and the Intellectually Disabled Patient

HEC Forum 24 (2):83-90 (2012)
Abstract In the case of an intellectually disabled patient, the attending physician was restricted from writing a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order. Although the rationale for this restriction was to protect the patient from an inappropriate quality of life judgment, it resulted in a worse death than the patient would have experienced had he not been disabled. Such restrictions that are intended to protect intellectually disabled patients may violate their right to equal treatment and to a dignified death
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,653
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Franklin G. Miller (1993). The Concept of Medically Indicated Treatment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):91-98.
    Richard T. Hull (1985). Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-10-05

    Total downloads

    9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums