The foundation walls that are carried by the house: A critique of the poverty of stimulus thesis and a Wittgensteinian-Dennettian alternative
Journal of Mind and Behavior 19 (2):177-193 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Language Metaphysics Mind Science Stimulus Chomsky, N Dennett, D Wittgenstein | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesG. E. Zuriff (1976). Stimulus Equivalence, Grammar, and Internal Structure. Behaviorism 4:43-52.
Carlos Lopez Losada (2002). La Ultima Nocion De Significado Estimular De Quine. Theoria 17 (1):113-135.
Robert C. Berwick, Paul Pietroski, Beracah Yankama & Noam Chomsky (2011). Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. Cognitive Science 35 (7):1207-1242.
John Mikhail (2008). The Poverty of the Moral Stimulus. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology Volume 1. MIT Press.
Ken Wexler (1991). On the Argument From the Poverty of the Stimulus. In Aka Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn. Basil Blackwell.
Christina Behme & H. S. (2008). Language Learning in Infancy: Does the Empirical Evidence Support a Domain Specific Language Acquisition Device? Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):641 – 671.
Joel W. Lidz & S. Waxman (2004). Reaffirming the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument: A Reply to the Replies. Cognition 93 (2):157-165.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (2001). The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
