David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):288-328 (2009)
In twentieth-century Kant scholarship, few have provided an account of the analytic-synthetic distinction and of the problem of the synthetic a priori that takes into consideration the views of Kant's idealist successors such as Maimon, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. I first explain how Kant formulates the analytic-synthetic distinction in terms of the determinate-indeterminate distinction, which, in turn, is based on the distinction between general and transcendental logic. Kant's problem of the synthetic a priori , then, is the problem of showing how the logical forms of judgment can be employed determinately (and not merely indeterminately). I then show that Maimon also formulates the distinction and the problem in the same way, and that his interpretation will shape how Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel each construe and address Kant's question, How are synthetic judgments possible a priori ?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sun-joo Shin (1997). Kant's Syntheticity Revisited by Peirce. Synthese 113 (1):1-41.
Michael Dummett (1982). Frege and Kant on Geometry. Inquiry 25 (2):233 – 254.
Shadworth H. Hodgson (1877). Kant's Analytic and Synthetic Judgments, and His Question, How Synthetic à Priori Judgments Are Possible. Mind 2 (5):118-122.
Dennis Schulting (2005). Hegel on Kant's 'Synthetic A Priori' in "Glauben Und Wissen&Quot;. In Andreas Arndt, Henning Ottman & Karol Bal (eds.), Hegel-Jahrbuch. Glauben und Wissen. Dritter Teil. Akademie Verlag.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2006). Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
Marian David (1997). Two Conceptions of the Synthetic A Priori. In L. E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (The Library of Living Philosophers). Chicago: Open Court. 629--651.
Willem R. de Jong (2010). The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Classical Model of Science: Kant, Bolzano and Frege. Synthese 174 (2):237-261.
Ash Gobar (1988). Erklärung and Begründung in Kantian Epistemology. Philosophy Research Archives 14:343-358.
Added to index2009-09-01
Total downloads159 ( #4,719 of 1,103,038 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,821 of 1,103,038 )
How can I increase my downloads?