The staccato roller coaster: a simple physical model of the staccato run
Synthese 190 (3):549-562 (2013)
| Abstract | I present a simple model of Grünbaum’s staccato run in classical mechanics, the staccato roller coaster. It consists of a bead sliding on a frictionless wire shaped like a roller coaster track with infinitely many hills of diminishing size, each of which is a one-dimensional variant of the so-called Norton dome. The staccato roller coaster proves beyond doubt the dynamical (and hence logical) possibility of supertasks in classical mechanics if the Norton dome is a proper system of classical mechanics with metaphysical import. If not, challenges raised against the metaphysical significance of the Norton dome are shown to be challenges against various arguments for the dynamical possibility of supertasks, and the staccato roller coaster clearly shows the importance of meeting these challenges. And the staccato roller coaster can provide, as well as interesting lessons, illuminating analyses of Burke’s (Mod Schoolman 78:1–8, 2000 ) attempt to refute the dynamical possibility of the staccato run and Pérez Laraudogoitia’s (Synthese 148:433–441, 2006 ) rebuttal of it. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Supertask Staccato run Norton dome Infinity | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. P. Laraudogoitia (2006). A Look at the Staccato Run. Synthese 148 (2):433 - 441.
Michael Burke (2000). The Staccato Run: A Contemporary Issue in the Zenonian Tradition. The Modern Schoolman 78 (1):1-8.
Cheryl Smith (2004). Surviving the Roller Coaster Ride. Business Ethics 18 (4):17-22.
Frances H. Miller & Walter W. Miller (2000). Lessons to Be Learned From Harvard Pilgrim HMO's Fiscal Roller Coaster Ride. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):287-304.
Javed Mohammed (2005). Riding the Roller Coaster: A Muslim Perspective on Overcoming the Challenges of Life. Amana Publications.
Samuel C. Fletcher (2012). What Counts as a Newtonian System? The View From Norton's Dome. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):275-297.
David Malament (2008). Norton's Slippery Slope. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):799-816.
Roger Penrose (1999). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. OUP Oxford.
John Norton (2008). The Dome: An Unexpectedly Simple Failure of Determinism. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):786-798.
Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (1998). Infinity Machines and Creation Ex Nihilo. Synthese 115 (2):259-265.
Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2005). An Interesting Fallacy Concerning Dynamical Supertasks. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):321-334.
Pam R. Sailors (forthcoming). Gender Roles Roll. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-14.
Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2005). An Interesting Fallacy Concerning Dynamical Supertasks. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):321 - 334.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-12-01Total downloads4 ( #178,675 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
