David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):319-344 (2007)
: Is Peirce's esthetic relevant for the philosophy of art—what is usually referred to today as aesthetics? At first glance Peirce's idiosyncratic esthetic seems quite unconcerned with issues of art. Yet a careful examination reveals that this is not the case. Thus, rather than attempt to "apply" Peirce's views to some aspect of the practice or the theory of art (e.g., creativity, historiography of art, style, genre), or even to a particular work of art, my intention is to examine how art fits into Peirce's own conception of his esthetic theory. The argument is divided into two parts. In the first section I present Peirce's conception of esthetics in the context of the normative sciences. I argue that esthetics connects with various strands of Peirce's philosophy, most notably his cosmology, his agapasm and with the way that important aspects of them hang together around the principle of abduction and the corresponding notion insight. In the second section, I consider in what way art may be said to be admirable, to contribute to the summum bonum. I try to show that Peirce's esthetic suggests that what attracts us towards art is first and foremost a semeiotic quality qua quality of mind or quality of Thirdness.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Francesco Poggiani (2012). What Makes a Reasoning Sound? C. S. Peirce's Normative Foundation of Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (1):31-50.
Bent Sørensen (2009). Comments Concerning the Artist in a Peircean Perspective. Semiotica 2009 (174):367-376.
Similar books and articles
Vincent G. Potter (1967). Charles S. Peirce on Norms & Ideals. Fordham University Press.
Gabriele Gava (2008). The Purposefulness in Our Thought: A Kantian Aid to Understanding Some Essential Features of Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 699-727.
Charles G. Conway (2008). The Normative Sciences at Work and Play. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 288-311.
James Liszka (2007). Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):636-644.
Beverley Kent (1976). Peirce's Esthetics: A New Look. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (3):263 - 283.
Mats Bergman (2007). Development, Purpose, and the Spectre of Anthropomorphism: Sundry Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):601 - 609.
Albert Atkin (2008). Peirce's Final Account of Signs and the Philosophy of Language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 63-85.
Clement Greenberg (1999). Homemade Esthetics: Observations on Art and Taste. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #100,235 of 1,911,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #36,995 of 1,911,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?