Graduate studies at Western
OUP Oxford (2003)
|Abstract||Can we rely on the altruism of professionals or the public service ethos to deliver good quality health and education services? And how should patients, parents, and pupils behave - as grateful recipients or active consumers? This book provides new answers to these questions - a milestone in the analysis and development of public policy, from one of the leading thinkers in the field. It provides a new perspective on policy design, emphasising the importance of analysing the motivation of professionals and others who work within the public sector, and both their and public service beneficiaries' capacity for agency or independent action. It argues that the conventional assumption that public sector professionals are public-spirited altruists or 'knights' is misplaced; but so is the alternative that they are all, in David Hume's terminology, 'knaves' or self-interested egoists. We also must not assume that individual citizens are passive recipients of public services (pawns); but nor can they be untrammelled sovereigns with unrestricted choices over services and resources (queens). Instead, policies must be designed so as to give the proper balance of motivation and agency. The book illustrates how this can be done by detailed empirical examination of recent policies in health services, education, social security and taxation. It puts forwards proposals for policy reform, several of which either originated with the author or with which he has been closely associated: universal capital or 'demogrants', discriminating vouchers, matching grants for pensions and for long-term care, and hypothecated taxes.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$14.91 used (82% off) $25.00 new (69% off) $71.28 direct from Amazon (11% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matt Commers (2002). Determinants of Health: Theory, Understanding, Portrayal, Policy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mairi Levitt (2003). Public Consultation in Bioethics. What's the Point of Asking the Public When They Have Neither Scientific nor Ethical Expertise? Health Care Analysis 11 (1):15-25.
Angus Dawson (2005). Risk Perceptions and Ethical Public Health Policy: MMR Vaccination in the UK. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):229-241.
J. Wilson (2011). Why It's Time to Stop Worrying About Paternalism in Health Policy. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):269-279.
Terry Hyland (1996). Professionalism, Ethics and Work-Based Learning. British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (2):168 - 180.
Stephen John (2009). Why 'Health' is Not a Central Category for Public Health Policy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):129-143.
Norman S. Care (1982). Future Generations, Public Policy, and the Motivation Problem. Environmental Ethics 4 (3):195-213.
Vanessa Scholes (2011). Beyond Serving a Purpose: Additional Ethical Focuses for Public Policy Agents. In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Eric R. A. N. Smith (1996). What is Public Opinion? Critical Review 10 (1):95-105.
Leslie London, Phyllis J. Orner & Landon Myer (2008). 'Even If You're Positive, You Still Have Rights Because You Are a Person': Human Rights and the Reproductive Choice of Hiv-Positive Persons. Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):11-22.
Hugh Compston (2008). The Future of Public Policy. World Futures 64 (1):43 – 59.
Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds (2009). Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?