On the Asymmetrical Difficulty of Acquiring Person Reference in French: Production Versus Comprehension [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (1):7-30 (2012)
Young French children freely produce subject pronouns by the age of 2. However, by age 2 and a half they fail to interpret 3rd person pronouns in an experimental setting designed to select a referent among three participants (speaker, hearer, and other). No such problems are found with 1st and 2nd person pronouns. We formalize our analysis of these empirical results in terms of direction-sensitive optimizations, showing that uni-directionality of optimization, when combined with non-adult-like constraint rankings, explains the general acquisition pattern of 3rd person pronouns. Building on a specific analysis of assigning 3rd person reference by computing over alternatives (Heim 1991 ), we show that adult interpretation does not require bidirectional OT although it is fully compatible with it. What matters for comprehension in the domain investigated here is constraint ranking
|Keywords||Personal pronouns French Computing over alternatives Bidirectional OT Constraint ranking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ira Noveck (2001). When Children Are More Logical Than Adults: Experimental Investigations of Scalar Implicature. Cognition 78 (2):165-188.
John Lyons (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
A. Papafragou (2003). Scalar Implicatures: Experiments at the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Cognition 86 (3):253-282.
R. Blutner (2000). Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17 (3):189-216.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Guido Melchior (2011). Privileges of First-Person Reference and of Third-Person Reference. Acta Analytica 26 (1):37-52.
Kelly Alberts (1987). Intentionality and First Person Reference. Philosophy Research Archives 13:613-636.
Petra Hendriks, Christina Englert, Ellis Wubs & John Hoeks (2008). Age Differences in Adults' Use of Referring Expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (4):443-466.
Spencer E. Cahill (1998). Toward a Sociology of the Person. Sociological Theory 16 (2):131-148.
Anne Newstead (2004). Self-Conscious Self-Reference: An Approach Based on Agent's Knowledge (DPhil Manuscript). Dissertation, Oxford University
William R. Carter (2002). Many Minds, No Persons. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):55-70.
Janyce M. Wiebe (1991). References in Narrative Text. Noûs 25 (4):457-486.
W. R. Carter (2002). Many Minds, No Persons. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):55-70.
Robert Sokolowski (2003). The Revelation of the Holy Trinity: A Study in Personal Pronouns. In Ethics and Theological Disclosures: The Thought of Robert Sokolowski. Catholic Univ of America Pr
Annalisa Coliva (2003). The First Person: Error Through Misidentification, the Split Between Speaker's and Semantic Reference, and the Real Guarantee. Journal of Philosophy 100 (8):416-431.
Thomas Metzinger (2003). Phenomenal Transparency and Cognitive Self-Reference. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (4):353-393.
Michael D. Barber (2008). Autonomy, Reciprocity, and Responsibility: Darwall and Levinas on the Second Person. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (5):629 – 644.
Added to index2011-12-16
Total downloads19 ( #167,084 of 1,781,279 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #167,843 of 1,781,279 )
How can I increase my downloads?