David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia Mathematica 20 (1):1-24 (2012)
Charles Peirce's diagrammatic logic — the Existential Graphs — is presented as a tool for illuminating how we know necessity, in answer to Benacerraf's famous challenge that most ‘semantics for mathematics’ do not ‘fit an acceptable epistemology’. It is suggested that necessary reasoning is in essence a recognition that a certain structure has the particular structure that it has. This means that, contra Hume and his contemporary heirs, necessity is observable. One just needs to pay attention, not merely to individual things but to how those things are related in larger structures, certain aspects of which relations force certain other aspects to be a certain way
|Keywords||modal epistemology peirce existential graphs benacerraf necessity intuition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Catherine Legg & James Franklin (2015). Perceiving Necessity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (3).
Similar books and articles
Robert W. Burch (1994). Game-Theoretical Semantics for Peirce's Existential Graphs. Synthese 99 (3):361 - 375.
P. N. Johnson-Laird (2002). Peirce, Logic Diagrams, and the Elementary Operations of Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 8 (1):69 – 95.
Esther Ramharter & Christian Gottschall (2011). Peirce's Search for a Graphical Modal Logic (Propositional Part). History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (2):153 - 176.
Eric M. Hammer (1998). Semantics for Existential Graphs. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (5):489-503.
B. H. Slater (1998). Peirce's Graphs Amended. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (2):101-106.
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2011). Existential Graphs: What a Diagrammatic Logic of Cognition Might Look Like. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):265-281.
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2006). Peirce's Contributions to Possible-Worlds Semantics. Studia Logica 82 (3):345 - 369.
Don D. Roberts (1973). The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague,Mouton.
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2005). Compositionality, Relevance, and Peirce's Logic of Existential Graphs. Axiomathes 15 (4):513-540.
W. John Coletta (1992). Peirce's "Existential Graphs" and the Pictorial Logic of Evolution. Semiotics:252-259.
Morgan Forbes (1997). Peirce's Existential Graphs. Teaching Philosophy 20 (4):387-400.
Kenneth Laine Ketner (1980). Peirce's Existential Graphs as the Basis for An Introduction to Logic. Semiotics:231-239.
Catherine Legg (2013). What is a Logical Diagram? In Sun-Joo Shin & Amirouche Moktefi (eds.), Visual Reasoning with Diagrams. Springer 1-18.
Added to index2011-04-16
Total downloads222 ( #10,492 of 1,789,728 )
Recent downloads (6 months)52 ( #17,330 of 1,789,728 )
How can I increase my downloads?