Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):357-408 (2003)
|Abstract||A serious crisis is identified in theories of neurocomputation, marked by a persistent disparity between the phenomenological or experiential account of visual perception and the neurophysiological level of description of the visual system. In particular, conventional concepts of neural processing offer no explanation for the holistic global aspects of perception identified by Gestalt theory. The problem is paradigmatic and can be traced to contemporary concepts of the functional role of the neural cell, known as the Neuron Doctrine. In the absence of an alternative neurophysiologically plausible model, I propose a perceptual modeling approach, to model the percept as experienced subjectively, rather than modeling the objective neurophysiological state of the visual system that supposedly subserves that experience. A Gestalt Bubble model is presented to demonstrate how the elusive Gestalt principles of emergence, reification, and invariance can be expressed in a quantitative model of the subjective experience of visual consciousness. That model in turn reveals a unique computational strategy underlying visual processing, which is unlike any algorithm devised by man, and certainly unlike the atomistic feed-forward model of neurocomputation offered by the Neuron Doctrine paradigm. The perceptual modeling approach reveals the primary function of perception as that of generating a fully spatial virtual-reality replica of the external world in an internal representation. The common objections to this picture-in-the-head concept of perceptual representation are shown to be ill founded. Key Words: brain-anchored; Cartesian theatre; consciousness; emergence; extrinsic constraints; filling-in; Gestalt; homunculus; indirect realism; intrinsic constraints; invariance; isomorphism; multistability; objective phenomenology; perceptual modeling; perspective; phenomenology; psychophysical parallelism; psychophysical postulate; qualia; reification; representationalism; structural coherence.|
|Keywords||*Gestalt Psychology *Gestalt Therapy *Neurosciences *Visual Perception Models|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Steven Lehar, Computational Implications of Gestalt Theory: The Role of Feedback in Visual Processing.
Steven Lehar (2003). The World in Your Head: A Gestalt View of the Mechanism of Conscious Experience. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Slobodan Markovic (2003). The Soap Bubble: Phenomenal State or Perceptual System Dynamics? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):420-421.
Dan Lloyd (2003). Double Trouble for Gestalt Bubbles. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):417-418.
Professor Max Velmans (2003). Is the World in the Brain, or the Brain in the World? (A Commentary on Lehar, S. Gestalt Isomorphism and the Primacy of Subjective Conscious Experience: A Gestalt Bubble Model, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, in Press). Velmans, Professor Max (2003) is the World in the Brain, or the Brain in the World? (A Commentary on Lehar, S. Gestalt Isomorphism and the Primacy of Subjective Conscious Experience.
Gaetano Kanizsa (1994). Gestalt Theory has Been Misinterpreted, but has Had Some Real Conceptual Difficulties. Philosophical Psychology 7 (2):149-162.
Victor Rosenthal & Yves-Marie Visetti (2003). Gestalt Bubble and the Genesis of Space. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):424-424.
Birgitta Dresp (2003). Double, Double, Toil and Trouble – Fire Burn, and Theory Bubble! Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):409-410.
Stephen Grossberg (2003). Linking Visual Cortex to Visual Perception: An Alternative to the Gestalt Bubble. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):412-413.
Steven Lehar (1998). Gestalt Isomorphism and the Primacy of the Subjective Perceptual Experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):763-764.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads85 ( #10,829 of 738,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #11,480 of 738,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?