Graduate studies at Western
Continental Philosophy Review 41 (3):301-322 (2008)
|Abstract||Over the past few decades, the work of Georg Simmel (1858–1918) has again become of interest. Its reception, however, has been fairly one-sided and selective, mostly because Simmel’s philosophy has been bypassed in favor of his sociological contributions. This article examines Simmel’s explicit reflections on the nature of philosophy. Simmel defines philosophy through three aspects which, according to him, are common to all philosophical schools. First, philosophical reasoning implies the effort to think without preconditions. Second, Simmel maintains that in contrast to other sciences, only philosophy is oriented toward constructing a general view of the world. Third, Simmel claims that philosophical work worthy of the name creates a sphere of a typical way of being in relation to world, a third sphere that is between the personal and the objective. According to Simmel, what has made philosophy’s eminent figures great is that they have advanced a type of thinking and developed it into a particularly interesting form, and this type can still correspond with the way we experience the world. It is significant that these three aspects through which Simmel defines philosophical activity emphasize the forms of questioning, not the contents or objects of thought. Still, he thinks that an interaction with concrete examples is always required in order to make philosophy a meaningful activity. This stance is reflected in the wide variety of topics studied by Simmel himself. In his last works Simmel began to emphasize another aspect of philosophy, its nature as a living movement of thought related to fundamental human limitedness: just as life itself ceaselessly reaches beyond its present form, so philosophy constantly strives to overcome the preconditions of thinking.|
|Keywords||Georg Simmel Conception of philosophy Type of philosopher Philosophy of life|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Coleman (2002). Taking Simmel Seriously in Evolutionary Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):55-74.
Jorge Arditi (1996). Simmel's Theory of Alienation and the Decline of the Nonrational. Sociological Theory 14 (2):93-108.
Paul Kamolnick (2001). Simmel's Legacy for Contemporary Value Theory: A Critical Assessment. Sociological Theory 19 (1):65-85.
Eduardo de La Fuente (2008). The Art of Social Forms and the Social Forms of Art: The Sociology-Aesthetics Nexus in Georg Simmel's Thought. Sociological Theory 26 (4):344 - 362.
Frederic Vandenberghe (1999). Simmel and Weber as Ideal-Typical Founders of Sociology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):57-80.
Bradley E. Starr (1996). The Tragedy of the Kingdom: Simmel and Troeltsch on Prophetic Religion. Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):141 - 167.
Olli Pyyhtinen (2008). Ambiguous Individuality: Georg Simmel on the “Who” and the “What” of the Individual. [REVIEW] Human Studies 31 (3):279 - 298.
Gary Backhaus (1998). Georg Simmel as an Eidetic Social Scientist. Sociological Theory 16 (3):260-281.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 726,191 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 726,191 )
How can I increase my downloads?