David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):347-376 (2006)
This article explores Charles Taylor's Hegelian and Aristotelian ethic of reconciliation. It comments on the critical work provided by Joel Anderson, Jürgen Habermas, Chandras Kukathas, Morag Patrick, Philip Pettit and Mark Redhead. It is argued that these critical perspectives on Taylor's work have not fully developed the spirit of liberalism which runs like a red thread through his ethic of reconciliation. For Taylor, reconciliation embraces others who are different from us and aims to create a virtuous culture. Taylor's critics overlook the liberal implications of his ethic and also do not recognize his commitment to the plural diversity in modern societies. Taylor's communitarianism (post-liberalism in his mind) aims to create trust, openness and democratic accountability. The article concludes that democratic practice must also engage with others who are different from us, fostering a fusion of horizons that creates reconciliation and understanding. Key Words: communitarianism ecology interpretation liberalism post-liberalism public sphere reconciliation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Glen Lehman (2007). A Common Pitch and the Management of Corporate Relations: Interpretation, Ethics and Managerialism. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):161 - 178.
Glen Lehman (2007). A Common Pitch and The Management of Corporate Relations: Interpretation, Ethics and Managerialism. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):161-178.
Michael Temelini (2013). Dialogical Approaches to Struggles Over Recognition and Distribution. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (4):1-25.
Similar books and articles
Mark Redhead (2006). Alternative Secularisms. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (5):639-666.
John Rundell (2010). Charles Taylor and the Secularization Thesis. Critical Horizons 11 (1):119-132.
Sebastian Gurciullo (2001). Making Modern Identity: Charles Taylor's Retrieval of Moral Sources. Critical Horizons 2 (1):93-125.
Hilliard Aronovitch (2005). Trudeau or Taylor? The Central Question. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):309-325.
Mark Redhead (2001). Charles Taylor's Nietzschean Predicament: A Dilemma More Self-Revealing Than Foreboding. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (6):81-106.
Ruth Abbey (2002). Pluralism in Practice: The Political Thought of Charles Taylor. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):98-123.
Charles Taylor, James Tully & Daniel M. Weinstock (eds.) (1994). Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. Cambridge University Press.
Yong Huang (1998). Charles Taylor's Transcendental Arguments for Liberal Communitarianism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):79-106.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #203,566 of 1,789,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #423,018 of 1,789,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?