Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 9 (1-4):274 – 283 (1966)
|Abstract||In this paper an attempt is made to provide an analysis of the meaning of the term function and related terms as they are used by R. K. Merton in the first chapter of his book Social Theory and Social Structure. Several problems are suggested which must be solved if statements about functions are to be considered scientifically adequate. Secondly the term functionalism is defined and several of Merton's functionalist explanations of social phenomena are stated and criticized.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Warren Schmaus (1999). Functionalism and the Meaning of Social Facts. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):323.
Martin Mahner & Mario Bunge (2001). Function and Functionalism: A Synthetic Perspective. Philosophy of Science 68 (1):75-94.
Joseph Agassi (2009). Turner on Merton. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):284-293.
Charles Crothers (2009). Merton's Flawed and Incomplete Methodological Program: Response to Stephen Turner. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):272-283.
Harold Kincaid (2009). A More Sophisticated Merton. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):266-271.
Stephen P. Turner (1993). Review Essays : The End of Functionalism: Parsons, Merton, and Their Heirs. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):228-228.
Colin McGinn (1981). A Note on Functionalism and Function. Philosophical Topics 12 (1):169-70.
Elliott Sober (1990). Putting the Function Back Into Functionalism. In William G. Lycan (ed.), Mind and Cognition. Blackwell.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads16 ( #82,042 of 752,081 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 752,081 )
How can I increase my downloads?