Journal of Business Ethics 103 (S1):33-44 (2011)
|Abstract||What makes insurance special among risk technologies is the particular way in which it links solidarity and technical rationality. On one hand, within insurance practices ‘risk’ is always defined in technical terms. It is related to monetary measurement of value and to statistical probability calculated for a limited population. On the other hand, and at the same time, insurance has an inherent connection to solidarity. When taking out an insurance, one participates in the risk pool within which each member is reciprocally responsible for others’ risks. The combination of technical controllability and solidarity has made insurance a successful tool for governing welfare societies during the twentieth century. From the point of view of business ethics, it is interesting that, as we argue in this article, the connection between insurance and solidarity is not limited to social welfare assemblages, but is evident in relation to private insurance as well. At the same time, however, it is important to understand that insurance does not advance all forms of solidarity. Hence, this theoretical article analyzes the specific conceptions of solidarity that the different forms of insurance practice produce. Particular emphasis is put on the distinction between ‘chance solidarity’ and ‘subsidizing solidarity’. The main questions of the article are: What kinds of conceptions of solidarity are built in the insurance technology? And how are the limits of solidarity defined and justified in different forms of insurance?|
|Keywords||Chance solidarity Insurance Life insurance Risk Risk technologies Solidarity Subsidizing solidarity Welfare|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Veikko Launis (2003). Solidarity, Genetic Discrimination, and Insurance. Social Theory and Practice 29 (1):87-111.
Kees Schuyt (1998). The Sharing of Risks and the Risks of Sharing: Solidarity and Social Justice in the Welfare State. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3):297-311.
Ruud H. J. Ter Meulen (1995). Limiting Solidarity in the Netherlands: A Two-Tier System on the Way. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6).
Robert W. Cooper & Mark S. Dorfman (2003). Business and Professional Ethics in Transitional Economies and Beyond: Considerations for the Insurance Industries of Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4):381 - 392.
Robert W. Cooper & Garry L. Frank (2002). Ethical Challenges in the Two Main Segments of the Insurance Industry: Key Considerations in the Evolving Financial Services Marketplace. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):5 - 20.
Massimo Reichlin (2011). The Role of Solidarity in Social Responsibility for Health. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):365-370.
Klaus Peter Rippe (1998). Diminishing Solidarity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3):355-373.
Felix Thiele (2003). Genetic Tests in the Insurance System: Criteria for a Moral Evaluation. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):185-195.
Luis Lobo-Guerrero (2013). Uberrima Fides, Foucault and the Security of Uncertainty. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):23-37.
Richard Watt, Francisco J. Vázquez & Ignacio Moreno (2001). An Experiment on Rational Insurance Decisions. Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):247-296.
Patrick L. Brockett & E. Susan Tankersley (1997). The Genetics Revolution, Economics, Ethics and Insurance. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (15):1661-1676.
William R. Cupach & James M. Carson (2002). The Influence of Compensation on Product Recommendations Made by Insurance Agents. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (2):167 - 176.
Simon Derpmann (2009). Solidarity and Cosmopolitanism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):303 - 315.
Added to index2012-02-15
Total downloads11 ( #107,400 of 722,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,756 of 722,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?