Ratio 15 (1):23–45 (2002)
|Abstract||This paper considers an allegation by M. Stocker and E. Hegeman that Aristotle’s account of anger yields a narcissistic passion bedevilled by illusions of self-sufficiency. The paper argues on behalf of Aristotle’s valuing of anger within a virtuous and flourishing life, showing that and why Aristotle’s account is neither narcissistic nor involves illusions of self-sufficiency. In so arguing a deeper appreciation of Aristotle’s understanding of a self-sufficient life is reached, as are some interesting contrasts between Aristotle's understanding of anger, its connections to value and our own understanding of these matters|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Zena Hitz (2011). Aristotle on Self-Knowledge and Friendship. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (12):1-28.
Jonathan J. Sanford (2010). Are You Man Enough? Aristotle and Courage. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):431-445.
Michael Rota (2007). The Moral Status of Anger: Thomas Aquinas and John Cassian. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):395-418.
Stephen Leighton (2003). Aristotle’s Exclusion of Anger From the Experience of Tragedy. Ancient Philosophy 23 (2):361-381.
Stephen Everson (1997). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
Kurt Pritzl (2006). The Place of Intellect in Aristotle. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:57-75.
Michael Potegal (2005). Characteristics of Anger: Notes for a Systems Theory of Emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):215-216.
Peter Vernezze (2008). Moderation or the Middle Way: Two Approaches to Anger. Philosophy East and West 58 (1):2-16.
Gregory Sadler (2008). Forgiveness, Anger, and Virtue in an Aristotelean Perspective. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:229-247.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #45,693 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?