Advanced topics in jurisprudence: Methodology
|Abstract||The topic this semester will be “methodology,” with special (but not exclusive) reference to the recent, voluminous literature on this topic in legal philosophy. There are two central questions: (1) Is there a distinctive method of philosophical inquiry? (2) What is the relationship between philosophical methods and the methods (and results) of the empirical sciences (broadly construed)?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Edmund L. Erde (1995). Method and Methodology in Medical Ethics: Inaugurating Another New Section. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (3).
Richard A. Posner (1995). Overcoming Law. Harvard University Press.
Erich Ammereller & Eugen Fisher (eds.) (2004). Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. Routledge.
J. W. Harris (1997). Legal Philosophies. Lexis Nexis.
G. W. Paton (1972). A Textbook of Jurisprudence. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
Brian Leiter (2007). Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Christopher B. Gray (2010). The Methodology of Maurice Hauriou: Legal, Sociological, Philosophical. Rodopi.
David Brooke (2009). Jurisprudence, 2009-2010. Routledge-Cavendish.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?