Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (3):341-371 (2004)
|Abstract||In this paper we investigate two purely syntactical notions ofcircularity, which we call ``self-application'''' and ``self-inclusion.'''' Alanguage containing self-application allows linguistic items to beapplied to themselves. In a language allowing for self-inclusion thereare expressions which include themselves as a proper part. We introduceaxiomatic systems of syntax which include identity criteria andexistence axioms for such expressions. The consistency of these axiomsystems will be shown by providing a variety of different models –these models being our circular languages. Finally we will show what apossible semantics for these circular languages could look like.|
|Keywords||application circularity non-well-founded sets paradox syntax|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
O. Bueno & M. Colyvan (2003). Yablo's Paradox and Referring to Infinite Objects. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Aldo Antonelli (2000). Virtuous Circles. In Anil Gupta & Andre Chapuis (eds.), Circularity, Definition, and Truth. Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
Hannes Leitgeb (2001). Truth as Translation – Part A. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (4):281-307.
I. L. Humberstone (1997). Two Types of Circularity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):249-280.
Harold I. Brown (1994). Circular Justifications. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:406 - 414.
J. A. Burgess (2008). When is Circularity in Definitions Benign? Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):214–233.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,180 of 722,827 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,645 of 722,827 )
How can I increase my downloads?