Damned if they do, Damned if they don't: the European Court of Human Rights and the Protection of Religion from Attack
Graduate studies at Western
Res Publica 17 (1):55-73 (2011)
|Abstract||The approach of the European Court of Human Rights to cases of religiously offensive expression is inconsistent and unsatisfactory. A critical analysis of the Court’s jurisprudence on blasphemy, religious insult and religious hatred identifies three problems with its approach in this field. These are: the embellishment and over-emphasis of freedom of religion, the use of the margin of appreciation and the devaluing of some forms of offensive speech. Nevertheless, it is possible to defend a more coherent approach to the limitation of freedom of expression under the European Convention of Human Rights, designed to protect religious liberty in a narrower category of cases|
|Keywords||Blasphemy Religious insult Religious hatred Freedom of expression European Court of Human Rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jill Marshall (2008). Women's Right to Autonomy and Identity in European Human Rights Law: Manifesting One's Religion. Res Publica 14 (3):177-192.
Douwe Korff, The Right to Life: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Gregory Lewkowicz, Human Rights, Citizen Rights: The Presuppositions of the American and European Case Law.
Eric Barendt (2011). Religious Hatred Laws: Protecting Groups or Belief? Res Publica 17 (1):41-53.
Francesca Bignami (2009). Constitutional Patriotism and the Right to Privacy : A Comparison of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. In Thérèse Murphy (ed.), New Technologies and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Sylvie Bacquet, School Uniforms, Religious Symbols and the Human Rights Act 1998: The 'Purity Ring' Case.
Louis Henkin (1998). Religion, Religions, and Human Rights. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):229 - 239.
George Letsas (2007). A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. OUP Oxford.
Chris Miller (2003). Environmental Rights in a Welfare State? A Comment on DeMerieux. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (1):111-125.
Added to index2011-01-01
Total downloads9 ( #122,562 of 738,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,337 of 738,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?