Life Extension Research: Health, Illness, and Death
Health Care Analysis 12 (2):117-129 (2004)
| Abstract | Scientists, bioethicists, and policy makers are currently engaged in a contentious debate about the scientific prospects and morality of efforts to increase human longevity. Some demographers and geneticists suggest that there is little reason to think that it will be possible to significantly extend the human lifespan. Other biodemographers and geneticists argue that there might well be increases in both life expectancy and lifespan. Bioethicists and policy makers are currently addressing many of the ethical, social, and economic issues raised by life extension research. However, the emphasis on philosophical argument supporting or condemning efforts to increase human longevity means that much less attention is currently being given to the factors that might play a role in generating interest in efforts to increase human longevity. This analysis considers three factors that might play a role in heightening public interest in efforts to develop biomedical technologies capable of retarding or reversing aging processes. While discussions of life extension research can seem quite futuristic and impractical, there are some powerful existential factors that might well generate considerable public support for life extension strategies if effective biomedical interventions emerge. Rather than providing philosophical justifications supporting or condemning efforts to increase human longevity, this essay seeks to promote a better understanding of the factors generating contemporary interest in prolonging life and postponing death | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn K. Davis (2005). Life-Extension and the Malthusian Objection. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):27 – 44.
Christopher Wareham (2012). Life Extension and Mental Ageing. Philosophical Papers 41 (3):455-477.
Matthew Cotton (2009). Discourse, Upstream Public Engagement and the Governance of Human Life Extension Research. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):135-150.
Lisa Bortolotti (2010). Agency, Life Extension, and the Meaning of Life. The Monist 93 (1):38-56.
Lisa Bortolotti (2010). Agency, Life Extension, and the Meaning of Life. The Monist 93 (1):38-56.
Paul T. Menzel (2011). The Value of Life at the End of Life: A Critical Assessment of Hope and Other Factors. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):215-223.
Christine Overall (2003). Aging, Death, and Human Longevity: A Philosophical Inquiry. University of California Press.
Ray Fitzpatrick (1999). Principles and Problems in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Health Care. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):37-46.
Sharon R. Kaufman (2010). Making Longevity in an Aging Society Linking Medicare Policy and the New Ethical Field. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (3):407-424.
Anne Moates (2006). Reflections on Society, Medicine and Death. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (2):9.
Dan W. Brock (1993). Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
John K. Davis (2004). The Prolongevists Speak Up: The Life-Extension Ethics Session at the 10th Annual Congress of the International Association of Biomedical Gerontology. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):W6-W8.
Charlotte Delmar (forthcoming). Beyond the Drive to Satisfy Needs: In the Context of Health Care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.
Gerald Dworkin (2007). Pt. IV. The End of Life. The Definition of Death / Stuart Youngner ; The Aging Society and the Expansion of Senility: Biotechnological and Treatment Goals / Stephen Post ; Death is a Punch in the Jaw: Life-Extension and its Discontents / Felicia Nimue Ackerman ; Precedent Autonomy, Advance Directives, and End-of-Life Care / John K. Davis ; Physician-Assisted Death: The State of the Debate. [REVIEW] In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads12 ( #93,475 of 549,845 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,845 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
