Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):121-147 (2013)
|Abstract||In this essay I offer a new particularist reading of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. I argue that the interpretation I present not only helps us to resolve some puzzles about Aristotle’s goals and methods, but it also gives rise to a novel account of morality—an account that is both interesting and plausible in its own right. The goal of this paper is, in part, exegetical—that is, to figure out how to best understand the text of the Nicomachean Ethics. But this paper also aims to contribute to the current exciting and controversial debate over particularism. By taking the first steps towards a comprehensive particularist reading of Aristotle’s Ethics I hope to demonstrate that some of the mistrust of particularism is misplaces and that what is, perhaps, the most influential moral theory in the history of philosophy is, arguably, a particularist moral theory.|
|Keywords||Aristotle Particularism Generalism Virtue Ethics Nicomachean Ethics Doctrine of the Mean|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Aristotle (2006/1998). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
Jon Miller (ed.) (2011). Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Pekka Väyrynen (2011). Moral Particularism. In Christian B. Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum.
Gianluca di Muzio (2008). Aristotle's Alleged Moral Determinism in the Nicoachean Ethics. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:19-32.
Added to index2011-07-03
Total downloads330 ( #461 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #6,881 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?