The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence
In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEdward C. Moore (1957). Book Review:The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence H. G. Alexander. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 24 (4):367-.
Richard Arthur (2001). Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence. Ezio Vailati. Mind 110 (439):874-878.
Ernan McMullin (1956). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Philosophical Studies 6:175-176.
A. Gabbey (2003). Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence. Philosophical Review 112 (4):570-572.
James Collins (1959). The Leibniz.-Clarke Correspondence. The New Scholasticism 33 (1):109-110.
Michael Wenisch (2010). The Epistemological Roots of the Dispute Over Time and Freedom in the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):201-220.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
