Studia Logica 68 (1):69-87 (2001)
|Abstract||This papers deals with the class of axiomatic theories of truth for semantically closed languages, where the theories do not allow for standard models; i.e., those theories cannot be interpreted as referring to the natural number codes of sentences only (for an overview of axiomatic theories of truth in general, see Halbach). We are going to give new proofs for two well-known results in this area, and we also prove a new theorem on the nonstandardness of a certain theory of truth. The results indicate that the proof strategies for all the theorems on the nonstandardness of such theories are "essentially" of the same kind of structure.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vladimir Kanovei & Michael Reeken (2000). Extending Standard Models of ZFC to Models of Nonstandard Set Theories. Studia Logica 64 (1):37-59.
Wang Lu (2008). Theories of Meaning. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):83-98.
Volker Halbach (2001). Editorial Introduction. Studia Logica 68 (1):3-20.
Jeffrey Ketland (1999). Deflationism and Tarski's Paradise. Mind 108 (429):69-94.
Kentaro Fujimoto (2010). Relative Truth Definability of Axiomatic Truth Theories. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):305-344.
Volker Halbach (2000). Truth and Reduction. Erkenntnis 53 (1-2):97-126.
Eduardo Alejandro Barrio (2010). Theories of Truth Without Standard Models and Yablo's Sequences. Studia Logica 96 (3):375-391.
Ryan Christensen (2011). Theories and Theories of Truth. Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.
Panu Raatikainen (2008). On Rules of Inference and the Meanings of Logical Constants. Analysis 68 (300):282-287.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #34,173 of 549,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?