A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling

Theory and Decision 50 (3):249-262 (2001)
This paper argues that any specific utility or disutility for gambling must be excluded from expected utility because such a theory is consequential while a pleasure or displeasure for gambling is a matter of process, not of consequences. A (dis)utility for gambling is modeled as a process utility which monotonically combines with expected utility restricted to consequences. This allows for a process (dis)utility for gambling to be revealed. As an illustration, the model shows how empirical observations in the Allais paradox can reveal a process disutility of gambling. A more general model of rational behavior combining processes and consequences is then proposed and discussed
Keywords Gambling  Expected utility  Process utility  Rationality  Consequentialism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1010325930290
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Don Ross (2010). Economic Models of Pathological Gambling. In D. Ross, D. Kincaid, D. Spurrett & P. Collins (eds.), What is Addiction? MIT Press 131--158.
Wesley Cooper (2008). Decision-Value Utilitarianism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):39-50.
Lisa Newton (1993). Gambling. Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (4):405-418.
Lisa H. Newton (2003). Gambling. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):405-418.
David B. Fletcher (2003). Gambling and Character. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):1-15.
Patrick Suppes (1981). The Limits of Rationality. Grazer Philosophische Studien 12:85-101.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

17 ( #156,793 of 1,724,882 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #134,547 of 1,724,882 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.