On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels

Philosophia 39 (2):335-344 (2011)
Abstract
Rik Peels has ingeniously argued that ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In this response, I defend the Standard View of Ignorance according to which they are equivalent. In the course of doing so, some important lessons will emerge concerning the nature of ignorance and its relationship to knowledge
Keywords Ignorance  Knowledge  Belief
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,825
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Rik Peels (2010). What is Ignorance? Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-10

Total downloads

19 ( #92,858 of 1,100,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #40,751 of 1,100,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.