David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):399-415 (2003)
In his book, Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism (1990), James Rachels argues that the Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection undermines the view that human beings are made in the image of God. By this he means that Darwinism makes things such that there is no longer any good reason to think that human beings are made in the image of God. Some other widely read and respected authors seem to share this view of the implications of Darwinism, most notably Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett. Unlike Dawkins and Dennett, Rachels gives a detailed argument for this view about the implications of Darwinism. In this article I explain Rachels’s argument and critically engage with it, arguing that he does not sufficiently well consider all of the options that are open to the theist in defending the view that human beings are made in the image of God
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Craig A. Boyd (2004). Was Thomas Aquinas a Sociobiologist? Thomistic Natural Law, Rational Goods, and Sociobiology. Zygon 39 (3):659-680.
Similar books and articles
James Rachels (1990). Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford University Press.
Witold Jacórzyński (1994). Stworzeni Ze Zwierząt (James Rachels, Created From Animals. The Moral Implication of Darwinism). Etyka 27.
Matthew Braddock (2009). Evolutionary Psychology's Moral Implications. Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):531-540.
Janet Radcliffe Richards (2000). Human Nature After Darwin: A Philosophical Introduction. Routledge.
Davide Vecchi (2012). Taking Biology Seriously : Neo-Darwinism and its Many Challenges. In Martin H. Brinkworth & Friedel Weinert (eds.), Evolution 2.0: Implications of Darwinism in Philosophy and the Social and Natural Sciences. Springer
J. W. Stoelhorst (2008). The Explanatory Logic and Ontological Commitments of Generalized Darwinism. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (4):343-363.
James H. Fetzer (2011). Evolution and Atheism: Has Griffin Reconciled Science and Religion? Synthese 178 (2):381 - 396.
Peter T. Saunders (2003). Bricks Without Straw: Darwinism in the Social Sciences. Theoria 18 (3):259-272.
Jorge M. Escobar (2012). Autopoiesis and Darwinism. Synthese 185 (1):53-72.
Peter Amato (2003). A Darwinian Left. Social Theory and Practice 29 (3):515-522.
Christopher Southgate (2011). Re-Reading Genesis, John, and Job: A Christian Response to Darwinism. Zygon 46 (2):370-395.
Joeri Witteveen (2009). Darwinism About Darwinism. [REVIEW] Biological Theory 4 (2):207-213.
Added to index2011-02-22
Total downloads14 ( #264,769 of 1,911,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #323,440 of 1,911,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?