On becoming extinct

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):253–269 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From an impersonal, timeless perspective it is hard to identify good reasons why it should matter that human extinction comes later rather than sooner, particularly if we accept that it does not matter how many human beings there are. We cannot appeal to the natural narrative shape of human history for there is no such thing. We have more local and particular concerns to which we can better appeal but only if an impersonal, timeless perspective is abandoned: only from a generation–centred perspective do such concerns help to make sense of our concern for the timing of our own extinction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
380 (#50,032)

6 months
97 (#39,877)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Lenman
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

On the survival of humanity.Johann Frick - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2-3):344-367.
Our Cosmic Insignificance.Guy Kahane - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):745-772.
Our Cosmic Insignificance.Guy Kahane - 2013 - Noûs 48 (4):745-772.
Effective Justice.Roger Crisp & Theron Pummer - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (4):398-415.
Human extinction and the value of our efforts.Brooke Alan Trisel - 2004 - Philosophical Forum 35 (3):371–391.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references