Temporary labour migration, global redistribution, and democratic justice

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):206-230 (2012)
Abstract
Calls to expand temporary work programmes come from two directions. First, as global justice advocates observe, every year thousands of poor migrants cross borders in search of better opportunities, often in the form of improved employment opportunities. As a result, international organizations now lobby in favour of expanding ‘guest-work’ opportunities, that is, opportunities for citizens of poorer countries to migrate temporarily to wealthier countries to fill labour shortages. Second, temporary work programmes permit domestic governments to respond to two internal, contradictory political pressures: (1) to fill labour shortages and (2) to do so without increasing rates of permanent migration. Temporary work programmes permit governments to appear ‘tough’ on migration, while responding to employer pressure to locate workers willing to work in low-skilled, poorly remunerated positions. The coincidence of national self-interest and global justice generates a strong case in favour of expanding guest-work. We evaluate the moral benefits and burdens of expanding guest-work opportunities, and conclude that although there are benefits to be gleaned from the perspective of global wealth redistribution, at present, temporary work programmes are generally unjust. We will argue that just temporary work programmes, in time, permit temporary workers to attain citizenship. This spells the end of traditional temporary work programmes, which require that workers return to their home country in time; instead, what is temporary is the employment obligation that must be fulfilled as a requirement to access citizenship. As long as this requirement is met, we endorse guest-work programmes as a tool to respond to global inequality
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Alex Sager (2012). Political Rights, Republican Freedom, and Temporary Workers. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2):1-23.
Similar books and articles
Anca Gheaus (2013). Care Drain: Who Should Provide for the Children Left Behind? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):1-23.
Rainer Bauböck (2011). Temporary Migrants, Partial Citizenship and Hypermigration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):665-693.
Josh Clark (2005). Economic Migration and Justice. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):45-61.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2012). Global Health Justice and Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
R. Wasserman (2003). The Argument From Temporary Intrinsics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):413 – 419.
M. Eddon (2010). Three Arguments From Temporary Intrinsics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):605-619.
Alex Sager (2012). Political Rights, Republican Freedom, and Temporary Workers. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2):1-23.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-30

Total downloads

24 ( #68,241 of 1,096,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #139,663 of 1,096,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.