Graduate studies at Western
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):206-230 (2012)
|Abstract||Calls to expand temporary work programmes come from two directions. First, as global justice advocates observe, every year thousands of poor migrants cross borders in search of better opportunities, often in the form of improved employment opportunities. As a result, international organizations now lobby in favour of expanding ‘guest-work’ opportunities, that is, opportunities for citizens of poorer countries to migrate temporarily to wealthier countries to fill labour shortages. Second, temporary work programmes permit domestic governments to respond to two internal, contradictory political pressures: (1) to fill labour shortages and (2) to do so without increasing rates of permanent migration. Temporary work programmes permit governments to appear ‘tough’ on migration, while responding to employer pressure to locate workers willing to work in low-skilled, poorly remunerated positions. The coincidence of national self-interest and global justice generates a strong case in favour of expanding guest-work. We evaluate the moral benefits and burdens of expanding guest-work opportunities, and conclude that although there are benefits to be gleaned from the perspective of global wealth redistribution, at present, temporary work programmes are generally unjust. We will argue that just temporary work programmes, in time, permit temporary workers to attain citizenship. This spells the end of traditional temporary work programmes, which require that workers return to their home country in time; instead, what is temporary is the employment obligation that must be fulfilled as a requirement to access citizenship. As long as this requirement is met, we endorse guest-work programmes as a tool to respond to global inequality|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Zinovijus Ciupijus (2010). Ethical Pitfalls of Temporary Labour Migration: A Critical Review of Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 97 (S1):9-18.
Anca Gheaus (2013). Care Drain: Who Should Provide for the Children Left Behind? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):1-23.
Rainer Bauböck (2011). Temporary Migrants, Partial Citizenship and Hypermigration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):665-693.
Cristina Rodriguez, Guest Workers and Integration: Toward a Theory of What Immigrants and Americans Owe One Another.
Allison Westerman (2001). The Relation Between Corporate Training and Development Expenditures and the Use of Temporary Employees. Ethics and Behavior 11 (1):67 – 85.
Stefan Rummens (2009). No Justice Without Democracy: A Deliberative Approach to the Global Distribution of Wealth. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):657-680.
Josh Clark (2005). Economic Migration and Justice. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):45-61.
Speranta Dumitru (2012). Skilled Migration: Who Should Pay for What? Diversities 14 (1):8-23.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2012). Global Health Justice and Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
R. Wasserman (2003). The Argument From Temporary Intrinsics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):413 – 419.
Pablo Rychter (2011). How Coincidence Bears on Persistence. Philosophia 39 (4):759-770.
M. Eddon (2010). Three Arguments From Temporary Intrinsics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):605-619.
Ellen Bravo (2007). Taking on the Big Boys, or, Why Feminism is Good for Families, Business, and the Nation. Feminist Press at the City University of New York.
Alex Sager (forthcoming). Political Rights, Republican Freedom, and Temporary Workers. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-23.
Added to index2011-03-30
Total downloads22 ( #62,807 of 738,614 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,614 )
How can I increase my downloads?