Graduate studies at Western
Dialectica 57 (2):165–176 (2003)
|Abstract||Here, I defend the view that fictional narratives are illusionary and that fictional names are to be accounted metalinguistically, a blend of Walton’s and Donnellan’s theories. Besides, I offer a remedial semantic for sentences external to the story which connects those uses back to the text of the story and to the neighborhood of its retellings.|
|Keywords||Reference Fictional names Keith Donnellan Kendall Walton|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Delia Graff Fara (2011). You Can Call Me 'Stupid', ... Just Don't Call Me Stupid. Analysis 71 (3):492-501.
M. W. Pelczar (2001). Names as Tokens and Names as Tools. Synthese 128 (1-2):133 - 155.
E. C. (2000). The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Carlos E. Vasco (2000). The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Eros Corazza (2002). Description-Names. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):313-325.
Thomas Nadelhoffer & Tatyana Matveeva (2009). Positive Illusions, Perceived Control and the Free Will Debate. Mind and Language 24 (5):495-522.
Eldon C. Wait (1997). Dissipating Illusions. Human Studies 20 (2):221-242.
Casey O'Callaghan (2006). Cross-Modal Illusions and Perceptual Content: Lessons From Cross-Modal Illusions. Electroneurobiolog 14 (2):211-224.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,343 of 738,703 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?