David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 142 (1):109-142 (2004)
According to a plausible and influential account of perceptual knowledge, the truth-makers of beliefs that constitute perceptual knowledge must feature in the causal explanation of how we acquire those beliefs. However, this account runs into difficulties when it tries to accommodate time perception -- specifically perception of order and duration -- since the features we are apparently tracking in such perception are not causal. The central aim of the paper is to solve this epistemological puzzle. Two strategies are examined. The first strategy locates the causal truth-makers within the psychological mechanism underlying time perception, thus treating facts about time order and duration as mind-dependent. This strategy, however, is problematic. The second strategy modifies the causal account of perceptual knowledge to include a non-causal component in the explanation of belief-acquisition, namely chronometric explanation. Applying this much more satisfactory approach to perceptual knowledge of time, we can preserve the mind-independence of order and duration, but not that of time's flow
|Keywords||Belief Explanation Metaphysics Perception Time Truth Maker|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Rolf Ulrich & Claudia Maienborn (2010). Left–Right Coding of Past and Future in Language: The Mental Timeline During Sentence Processing. Cognition 117 (2):126-138.
Sean Enda Power (2013). Perceiving External Things and the Time-Lag Argument. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):94-117.
Similar books and articles
Roman Frigg, Review of 'the Images of Time. An Essay on Temporal Representation' by Robin le Poidevin. [REVIEW]
A. D. Smith (2001). Perception and Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):283-309.
Michel Treisman (1999). The Perception of Time: Philosophical Views and Psychological Evidence. In The Arguments of Time. New York: Oxford University Press
Curtis M. Hutt (1999). Husserl: Perception and the Ideality of Time. Philosophy Today 43 (4):370-385.
Sean Enda Power (2012). The Metaphysics of the 'Specious' Present. Erkenntnis 77 (1):121-132.
J. T. Fraser (1987). Time, the Familiar Stranger. University of Massachusetts Press.
W. A. Suchting (1969). Perception and the Time-Gap Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 19 (January):46-56.
Gerald E. Myers (1971). William James on Time Perception. Philosophy of Science 38 (September):353-360.
Robin Le Poidevin (2004). A Puzzle Concerning Time Perception. Synthese 142 (1):109 - 142.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads99 ( #38,155 of 1,789,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #59,220 of 1,789,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?