David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):325 – 335 (2006)
This paper advances a general argument, inspired by some remarks of Davidson, to show that appeal to meanings as entities in the theory of meaning is neither necessary nor sufficient for carrying out the tasks of the theory of meaning. The crucial point is that appeal to meaning as entities fails to provide us with an understanding of any expression of a language except insofar as we pick it out with an expression we understand which we tacitly recognize to be a translation of the term whose meaning we want to illuminate by the appeal to assigning to it a meaning. The meaning drops out as irrelevant: the work is done, and can only be done, by matching terms already understood with terms they translate.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. D. Bastable (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Philosophical Studies 11:327-328.
W. V. Quine (1953/1980). From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press.
Willard V. O. Quine (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Willard Orman Quinvane (1960). Word and Object. The Mit Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Miguel Hoeltje (2013). Lepore and Ludwig on 'Explicit Meaning Theories'. Philosophical Studies 165 (3):831-839.
Similar books and articles
Alberto Voltolini (1995). Is Meaning Without Actually Existing Reference Naturalizable? Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:397-414.
C. J. L. Talmage (1994). Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning. Erkenntnis 40 (2):213 - 225.
Ned Block (1995). Ruritania Revisited. Philosophical Issues 6:171-187.
Wayne A. Davis (2003). Meaning, Expression, and Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel Whiting (2010). Particular and General: Wittgenstein, Linguistic Rules, and Context. In The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Alberto Voltolini (1998). Asymmetrical Dependence Between Causal Laws Does Not Account for Meaning. In V. Abrusci (ed.), Prospettive della Logica e della Filosofia della scienza. ETS. 307-316.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #43,707 of 1,696,654 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #95,710 of 1,696,654 )
How can I increase my downloads?